🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined an organized professional network test this week after viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."