🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be slashed by over 50%, following a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to submit the future of hard-won Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include one or more councillors based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to vote for a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils were only able to establish a Māori ward by first submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities frequently spent years generating community backing and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying communities ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required councils that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their seats, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it wants to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – most cities mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to establish other types of wards – including rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation suggested the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that voted to keep their seats.